Saturday, February 28, 2015

Mother of Conversion, Controversy or Peace ?

Bloody Confusing...............

As A kid I too had heard of Mother Teresa. She was a graceful lady, serving the people of the country, that’s all I knew. And she had been honoured with Nobel Peace prize. 

And few days back RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat accused that primary work of Mother Teresa was conversion. Her intension was not serving the people.  Even the book The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice by British-American journalist and polemicist Christopher Hitchens. As per his book "Mother Teresa is less interested in helping the poor than in using them as an indefatigable source of wretchedness on which to fuel the expansion of her fundamentalist Roman Catholic beliefs."

Well I was compelled to think, what’s the truth? Why dig into someone’s life when deceased? But the truth can be known from those who worked with Mother Teresa or the biographers or from modern Indian historian. Might there be other ways.

Different books claim various ambiguous statements.

Some supported the statement by RSS chief and others blamed it. But in India, anything can be considered politically and religiously.

Whatever the motive is, how can Mother’s service towards the society and poor be left behind? Strange it is, we cannot even accept the service of someone gracefully.

Some even said she did not deserve the Nobel Peace prize. I do not know whether to agree with that, as the service of Mother is definitely responsible for destroying the peace of the so called keepers of Hindutva.  

The reason for converting the generous service of a person to controversy has not been revealed yet.  

Why these things did not come up when she was alive?  In India, why do not we use past as a mirror?  

Anyway, if people had for gotten Mother Teresa, now through this silly news, they will definitely remember her. May her soul rest in peace and not haunt the religious fundamentalists.

Our current prime minister is yet to make some statement regarding this serious national moral disaster; it seems he has gone into the Manmohan Singh stage. 

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

BlackView: Secularism

Secularism in India 

 is tantamount to

       Run time error in a computer program. 

Image source

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

The Beggar & Election

The heat of election had heated Delhi environment. On the stage the candidate climbed and soon some chamchas covered him with shawls and garlands. And he started sweating among the crowd. A herculean exercise he had to do, to deliver the speech. When it was over he was escorted out.  All the media persons were running to ask him a few very important questions that might decide the fate of Delhi. Crowd disappeared, the media started to disappear. Business was done for the day.

The eye of the reporter was laid on a beggar, who was not among the crowd and he was shivering in the cold of Delhi. He found it oddly interesting and approached the beggar. Now he wanted to interview him. Though the beggar was reluctant at first he agreed to do it for a packet of bidi and a meal.

The summary of the interview was: Nobody cares about the beggars, because they do not cast their vote. He does not have an identity card. He had seen from a distance that, he candidate who gave so promising speech on the stage that dissolved in the air the same moment was covered with shawls even though he wore sweater and jacket. And the beggar was here with minimal clothes and in cold, nobody cared.

And it was broadcasted the very day and all those who were standing to fight for election were alerted and the parties started making strategies to make an impact on people.

The U-turn Ex-CM said that this time if he becomes CM again he will do something for the beggars. This is the strategy of the other two major parties to keep them poor, this is conspiracy. He will pass an amendment in the parliament to protect the rights of the beggars. If the government does not agree, he will put on a muffler and do fasting in the cold of Delhi.

When Ra-fool Gandhi was asked to comment on the issue he said, their party has empowered women and they will empower the beggars this time, so that they can ride horses.

When the NaMo Modi was asked about it his remarks were different. He was a tea seller and became prime minister. So what a beggar can become is unimaginable. He promised to discuss the agenda in ‘Make in India’.

One controversial Pakshi Maharaj who had been continuously in news for his remarks on Hindutva was interviewed regarding the beggar problem,.  He babbled, ‘Begging is tradition of India and beggars should exist. In our history and mythology do not we have such examples? Beggars are the protectors of our traditions. Hence it should continue’

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Hindus Should Become Dhritarashtra

So Pakshi Maharaj said Hindu’s should have four children. So that it would give boom to the Hindu population in the country called India. It would definitely help quell the population of minority community. He wanted to send one of the children to be a soldier, other to be given to a religious leader another to be a teacher. He did not mention about fourth one… he has plans to make it a politician.

This four children concept is a poor idea in a populated country like India. 
Some political leader in Waste-Bengal said Hindu couples should have 5 children. He stated the reason that to protect Hinduism in India it is must. 

After a few days of this incident, there came another one, this time no political leader. It was a spiritual leader; Duracharya who gave a statement that Hindu couple should have 10 children. He wanted to make NaMo Modi again the prime minister.  This open eyed blind ignorant man forgot that one can cast vote when he attains an age of 18.

Well everything is coming up after the Make in India project came in picture. All is about productivity. So to increase productivity we need man power and how is it going to come. So produce children. If we want to outnumber China, it is must. If we want to export more people to other countries it is must. After all it is the question of Hindutva. We should spread Hinduism all over the world. Why do it just in India?  And to do that we would need more and more Hindus. This is the prime focus of developing India. India across the world.

So I do not think producing 10 children per Hindu couple would be enough. I am not a spiritual leader or an MP, or a minister, and hence my words might not be spread by media. It does not matter. I insist every Hindu couple to produce 100 children each like Dhritarashtra. And I am sure the result is going to be far more fruitful than all those who gave a myopic statement of producing 4, 5 and 10 children.  Make in India, growth and Hindutva is of prime focus.  

Let us be Dhritarashtra.

Then Oxford dictionary will introduce a new word ‘Hindutplation’.